Skip to main content

Drag wires

Progress on the airplane has been very limited as of late. It has, however, been made.
After a long episode of researching and calculating I have found drag wires.
  Not the drag wires the plans call for, but still. The plans want 1050 alloy steel wire to be threaded with a #6-40 thread and retained with what are essentially spoke-nipples from motorcycles wheels. The aircraft rated nipples are about $7 each and I need 24 of them. Spoke nipples are 20 to 50 cents each. We'll, I wasn't going to spend $170 on bolts, but $12 seemed reasonable, so I ordered a bunch of spoke nipples. I had intended to match the thread of the nipples with my drag wire stock, but they are just irregular enough that I couldn't find a thread that matched and it seemed like sending wires out to have the correct thread rolled on wouldn't be worth the effort. So, despite having bought my spoke nipples, I abandoned the idea of using them.
Enter the Baby Great Lakes. I researched drag wires and alternative ways to attach them while still using the brackets I have to attach them to the spars. In my search I came across the Baby Great Lakes, or Baby Lakes for short, a single seat, aerobatic biplane. It uses aluminum rod threaded at both ends and held in place with simple AN nuts inside of the mounting brackets instead of a nipple with some jam nuts to allow the wire to be turned when tightening.

Baby Lakes drag wire end. Needs a washer under the nylock.
 He has a great post explaining how it's done over on his blog which this picture is taken from: buildingthesuperbabygreatlakes.blogspot.com/2015/03/finishing-drag-wire-assemblies.html
 I decided to forgo my weirdly sized and problematic spoke nipples for this much simpler and proven solution. "But wait," I hear you cry, "what about the wires themselves, surely you're not trusting your wing to ALUMINUM drag wires?!" You're right, I'm not. Even though they work perfectly well in the Baby Lakes, the structure of my wing calls for 9/64" diameter 1050 steel wire and I don't know how aluminum would change the way it takes loads. Thus, I had to find some steel rod with a yield strength equivalent to that of 1050 steel. Through much searching I found out that either 416T stainless, or  a cold-finished 304 or 316 stainless steel has almost exactly the same yield as a 1050 alloy steel.
It was somewhere in here that I also decided using a #6 thread wasn't going to be practical because any stock would have to be turned down in diameter to be able to be threaded correctly. If I had a machinist's lathe that would have been easy, but then so would custom threading something to fit my spoke nipples.
  I opted instead to up the diameter of the drag wires to 3/16" which can be easily threaded with a #10 die. All of a sudden this opened up a much larger variety of steels as I was now trying to surpass the yield strength of a 9/64" rod (.107" minor diameter) with a 3/16" rod (.151" minor diameter). Now 4130 steel could be used, or any of the stainless alloys mentioned before. I opted for the 304 stainless rod as it's supposed to be easier to tap and ordered material for all 12 drag wires. The pieces are a little longer than needed, so I have lots of little bits to practice threading. 
This rabbit hole kept me busy for a long time, but I feel that the solution it led to is simpler, stronger, and more repeatable for anyone else looking to build an Ace. The only downside I see is that the larger wire adds about 2.3 pounds to the wings. I'll try to make that up somewhere else if I can.

Comments

  1. You talk about yield strength... wouldn't the main concern be stiffness (i.e. Young's modulus of Elasticity)? Or doesn't that matter?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stiffness is certainly a concern, but all the materials I looked at were as stiff or stiffer than the 1050 originally called for.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Where to start?

So, where does one start when building an airplane?   The answer changes from person to person. The kernel of inspiration to build an airplane was there, as I mentioned in the last post, from the time and effort it took to build the Spirit. But what plane? I looked at the trusty Pietenpol, but the size of the cockpits and the useful load left me wanting for something more. I looked at the Double Eagle and the Airbike, but my girlfriend didn't like how open they were. Finally, I made a list of what I thought I wanted in an airplane, reproduced here.  -High wing monoplane (biplanes mean building 4 wings)  -Taildragger w/tailwheel  -Fabric wings and stab.  -Aluminum tube or wood construction, maybe steel  -Inexpensive to build  -Inexpensive to operate  -Single carb engine.  -Aircooled?  -Two seats  -Mostly enclosed cockpit (not a breezy)  -minimal systems  -AOA/reserve lift guage  -Amphibious a plus   The Corben Junior Ace met almost all of these criteria. In time I

Fittings. How fitting.

  Not much has happened on the Ace this year. The winter was long and spring has been very cold, so I spent a long time waiting for the garage to warm up. Now that there's a little heat down there I've been making some headway on the next step of my wing build: fittings. I copied the parts off the plans into CAD and then printed them onto cardstock to use as patterns when laying fittings out on the steel stock.    First I tackled the brackets that will hold the pulleys for the aileron cables. I have a lot of extra material in case I had to remake these. The next step was to bend up my fittings. There is one fitting that mounts to the forward side of the strut which gets bent to a 90° angle. The fitting which mounts to the aft side of the spar gets bent at about an 85° angle. I forget the exact number, but don't feel like looking it up at the moment. Next I cut out the aileron control horns. My Harbor Freight porta-band chucked into my vice works well for cutting thes